this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
146 points (95.1% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

3318 readers
25 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 36 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I'd like to see an LLM get clear and non-conflicting requirements from a customer. It will probably nuke the planet in frustration.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think the only real use for AI today is with human oversight. Like, have it wrote your essay/code/business plan, but review it for actual use in the world. It can do something 75% accurate and add the knowledge of a competent human and you have 1 person doing the job of 4 people. It realistically 3 people since review takes time. This doesn't address the ethics of doing this, but is the only realistic way of using it in Mar 2024.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 11 points 6 months ago

That's how I've been using it: Like a sous chef.

[–] Avg@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's kind of my job and it's hard to find people that do it well.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's hard across the industry. You need to basically be a therapist with technical knowledge.

"Tell me how you feel when you think about processing expense reports. Do you feel that the approval checkbox be checked or unchecked?"

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 2 points 6 months ago

I'd like to see an LLM get clear and non-conflicting requirements from a customer.

Are you "a people person"?