this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
47 points (98.0% liked)
College Football
963 readers
1 users here now
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's all kind of a prisoners' dilemma though. Maintaining historic rivalries and a good current setup requires that no one else leave either. Otherwise, your most "desirable" opponents take the money and leave you with a situation that's just as awkward, but you've also got way less money than them now. Over time the money is helpful for the facilities and coaching arms races, and that may become more pronounced as donors route more of their money directly to the players. Once the barn door is opened, the horses bolt.
Can we cap sports expenditure for schools already so this whole debacle is moot?
D3 mostly has it right, though even there schools will knowingly provide more sports than they can reasonably support and recruit athletes with unrealistic promises because they want the tuition.
At least that’s simple desperation though; it could happen with any perk that any school offers. At the D1 level, when you think about it, it’s really quite insane that we’ve combined the highest level of purely developmental sport with the second highest level of spectator sport (with commensurate amounts of money involved) and tied it all together as officially sanctioned “extracurricular activities” at our universities.
No other country in the world does that. It’s bonkers, and while I love college football , it makes it a hard system to defend.