this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
1210 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

59466 readers
3354 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 127 points 7 months ago (11 children)

Some products — like devices powered by combustion engines, medical equipment, farming equipment, HVAC equipment, video game consoles, and energy storage systems — are excluded from Oregon’s rules entirely.

It's interesting to me that Game Consoles get an exception... Not sure whats up there, other than straight up ~~bribery~~ lobbying.

HVAC makes sense when you consider environmental concerns (some refrigerants are really terrible pollutants).

Medical equipment, particularly equipment in public health care should be held to high standards. Authorized, properly trained repair; peoples lives depend on it.

Energy storage when attached to public infrastructure (you back-feeding the grid) can be a saftey concern for workers and the supply/load needs to be balanced to prevent damaging that infrastructure and other private equipment attached to it. Not sure preventing repair is the right move here; you can still buy and install new without oversight. Perhaps it's again a saftey concern (for the person performing repair).

Vehicles, farming or otherwise, I'm on the fence about; there's an argument to be made for public saftey/roadworthness, but I'm not sure that's enough of an argument to prevent home-repair. Again seems more to do with lobbying than anything else.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 94 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The farming equipment exemption smells like John Deere's lobbies have been involved.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 29 points 7 months ago

Oh definitely.

[–] HaywardT@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There are lots of loyal green customers who are really pissed about the ability to not be able to repair their own stuff, but yet keep buying it. (Similar to a lot of iPhone users)

[–] Gestrid@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

but yet keep buying it.

Probably because they'll keep repairing it themselves anyway. Making it legal would just make it easier for them to repair it without triggering the tractor's version of DRM (can't remember what it's called).

[–] HaywardT@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 7 months ago

That is getting really hard to do. Seems like someone could make a market in controllers that replace the factory ones but hook to the factory sensors.

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 84 points 7 months ago

John Deere probably ~~bribed~~ lobbied hard for that carve out. It was their practices that helped drive the right to repair movement. Giving them a pass really diminishes the accomplishment.

Smaller farms are going to get screwed over with all the fees and mandatory maintenance that can be imposed.

Everyone gets angry about printers needing a debit card on file but manufacturers like John Deere do similar stuff. If they think you've tinkered with it, they can disable the equipment remotely.

[–] greybeard@lemmy.one 56 points 7 months ago (21 children)

Cars have been home repaired since cars existed. It has never been a notable safety concern. Somehow it suddenly is?

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 16 points 7 months ago

It's always been a concern; just not enough of one to explicitly forbid working on a vehicle without specific training/licensing. Hence vehicle inspections/roadworthy tests; someplaces more strictly than others.

It's possible that concern was part of the justification for not requiring manufacturers to make it easier. Spitballing.

As I said, I'm on the fence about it myself. Thing is, a vehicle on public roads has a lot of opportunity to injure or kill someone if a repair was made incorrectly. It's about more than just a person and the thing they own.

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 3 points 7 months ago

One thing I've notice is you can't modify the software "because of safety", but breaks, fuel pipes, ignition systems, that all fine to modify!

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 28 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

HVAC makes no sense to me considering the only real hazard in there is the actual refrigerant gas.

unless they manage to pair the gas, im sure they would if they could

[–] EarthBoundMisfit@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You joke but we're almost there. Refrigerants are getting more and more proprietary. I work in the industry and with the push to go to lower global warming potential (GWP) refrigerants manufacturers have developed their own formulas here. It varies from manufacturer to manufacturer even amongst almost identical equipment. Getting the right refrigerant will only become more and more expensive the more boutique it is. The equipment can already tell what kind of refrigerant is in there based on the system pressures and temperatures.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I've been watching Hyperspace Pirate on Youtube and he talks about how hard it is to get commercial access to some basic refrigerants (like ethylene) as someone who isn't a Pro HVAC tech, and he uses it as an excuse to to create them himself for part of his content.

[–] EarthBoundMisfit@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I'll have to check out the channel. Sounds interesting!

[–] vrek@programming.dev 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I work for a medical device manufacturer and you are missing a important reason for that exception. Yes human lives are on the line. In addition WE (meaning my company) are responsible for finding out why it broke and how we will prevent other devices we make from breaking.

We make a device and say it will last 10 years, 2 years later it stops. We have to replace it, We have to investigate to the best of our ability, We have to report our findings to the government, if several cases happen We need to come up with a prevention for the future dailures(or prevention if severe enough). We have entire departments for this. It is our burden not the consumer and it's our burden so we have enough evidence to determine root cause and final solution so we can prevent further failures.

[–] maryjayjay@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

As long as you offer a 10 year replacement warranty that's perfectly fine. Tandem was great about replacing my daughter's failed insulin pump.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

It’s interesting to me that Game Consoles get an exception… Not sure whats up there, other than straight up bribery lobbying.

Lots and LOTS of lobbying.

Let your representative know that that is not ok with you.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There's no excuses for any of these. None.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 0 points 7 months ago (22 children)

That's rather short sighted. I just listed several.

Don't know about you: I'd rather not have the ventilator keeping grandma alive repaired by the hospitals underpaid maintenance department; but a trained technician from the company that built it.

Some things are about more than just an individuals personal liberties.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The hospitals underpaid maintenance team vrs a licensed tech from the manufacturer is a false dichotomy. The choice could easily be the hospital's underpaid maintenance team or no repairs at all.

Realistically, they don't put grandma on the vent because they won't buy or keep a device they can't afford to repair.

And why would the company spend more time/effort on their repair staff than the hospital? The company license is no guarantee they aren't minimum wage nobodies.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Thing is, medical equipment suppliers should be held to higher standards than they are currently. If you're providing medical equipment to be used in public healthcare: you should be responsible for maintaining and repairing it imo.

There should be a minimum requirement for repair/maintenance/warranty provided by the manufacturer.

Hospitals don't invest in the ability to perform such repairs largely because of the liability involved, ontop of often being a poorly funded/staffed public service.

The company license is no guarantee they aren't minimum wage nobodies.

No, but then the manufacturer is responsible for the quality of repair/maintenance performed by its staff.

If something goes wrong with the equipment; it's on the equipment manufacturer instead of the hospital using it.

With a mandate on repair/maintenance; they'd be forced to provide quality service to survive.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Everything you just said applies to hospitals as well.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The refrigerant wouldn't have anything to do with parts pairing though. This is just the electronic components.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago

Parts pairing is just one piece of the puzzle; this is more broadly about access to parts, which would include proprietary refrigerants.

[–] JustARegularNerd@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Didn't Apple try and class their iPhones as game consoles a couple months back?

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

HVAC also makes sense because some idiots do things like using propane as a refrigerant in systems not designed for it, and then get a literal flamethrower next to their house.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

People were able to do that before this law so what's changed?

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

Honestly I tried to summarize what right ti repair is, but you’ll be better off actually looking into what this bill does.

Basically, for this application nothing changes. That’s kinda the point.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Aside from maybe HVAC dealing with refrigerant needing a licensed tech to work on, the rest of these not being included is such a scam.