You should probably read the book some time. People called him king but it wasn't a title he wanted or requested; the only title he used of himself was "Son of man". He didn't request anyone to lop ears off (and in fact repeately tried to drill into people that the way forward is love) and on the one occasion it's documented he rebuked the lopper and stuck the ear back on. It was the Pharisees and Sadducees that got riled up because Jesus exposed their hypocrisy, and the local leaders originally weren't interested because they just saw it as an internal religious matter, but the P&S knew what buttons to push and that's what got JC crucified. Pilate actually said he couldn't see what Jesus had done wrong.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago

That's the story told by his followers decades later. He would have been an apocalyptic peasant preacher, and most of those people have some combination of narcissism and mental instability. Most likely, he got killed for exactly what the sign on his crucifix said. Whitewashing his personality came later.

It's no good reason to kill someone. The Roman Empire was a brutal place. But he probably was guilty.

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

If I wanted credibility or accuracy I wouldn't read the Bible. In any case, he was a cheeky lad, knew how to get martyred but make it look political.

By the way, why were Jesus's disciples and followers carrying swords? Isn't that a contradiction?