this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
349 points (96.3% liked)

Fediverse

17560 readers
101 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Server indexes of places for newcomers to join can be instrumental for Fediverse adoption. However, sudden rule changes can leave some admins feeling pressure to change policies in order to remain listed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 26 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (35 children)

Maybe I'm naive but I kinda don't get it. People talk about defederating as if...what, all Meta IP addresses will be magically blocked from scraping your content? Any script kiddie can harvest Lemmy/Mastodon/whatever content.

Has Meta shown itself to be a bad actor? Yes. Should my email provider block all emails from Meta? Well...that's a bit much I think? If Facebook email still existed, should my email provider block that?

My point is yes, Meta bad, but all Thread users also bad? I thought


and apparently I'm very wrong here


that the Federation paradigm was kinda like email. And the only email I want blocked is a domain where every single user is malicious, not a domain run by a malicious entity which has normal people as users, who aren't necessarily very tech literate.

I don't actually care, but I just find it a little confusing tbh.

[–] young_broccoli@fedia.io 29 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I dont care if they scrape my comments I just wouldnt want to see sneaky "promoted" posts aka ads and I enjoy the idea of boycotting facebook.

Ultimately the decision is for the instances owners and admins to make, not ours. I will just migrate to one that doesnt federate with facebook if I have to.

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I just wouldnt want to see sneaky “promoted” posts aka ads

I don't quite see how that would even work. Those posts would need to be coming from individual users rather than from Facebook itself and you can just block those users. Facebook can display ads in between posts on their own app but those wont be visible to people using other apps.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Here's one scenario.

  1. Facebook feeds its users content according to an algorithm.

  2. Facebook and lemmy users can interact with the same user content (liking, commenting).

  3. There are vastly more Facebook users than lemmy users.

  4. By dint of Facebook's greater number of users, lemmy users will see the most popular content that is fed algorithmically to Facebook users.

Conclusion: lemmy users are being fed content by the Facebook algorithm (in this still, thankfully hypothetical, scenario).

Like imagine Facebook promotes some viral post and it gets a thousands of upvotes. Any lemmy user on a federated instance, sorting by upvotes/hot/etc, is going to see that post.

That's the kind of top-down reach that is so alien to the fedi

[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Facebook could just create fake users that post ads as content

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago

Hopefully fediverse admins are sensible enough to ban users who are blatantly posting advertisements. I know that a lot are, but I also know that a few of the bigger servers tend to turn a blind eye to that kind of thing.

[–] young_broccoli@fedia.io 2 points 6 months ago

See Grrgyle's reply. That would be mine If I could explain things as good as them.

[–] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I just wouldnt want to see sneaky "promoted" posts aka ads

Nobody is forcing you to follow users/communities on Threads.

[–] young_broccoli@fedia.io 2 points 6 months ago

I like to browse by "all". And nobody is forcing me to use an instance that federates with facebook either, like I said, I'll migrate if I have to.

load more comments (32 replies)