this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
1243 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59422 readers
3649 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

They supposedly can be disabled in settings- but we all know that won't last. They're going full Microsoft Skype mode and it's only a matter of time.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kaitco@lemmy.world 65 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I’m shocked they’re moving to ads when I’ve been paying them $4/month for Discord Nitro for several years now. Surely, that revenue is enough for their upkeep???

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 96 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It's never enough. Growth must be un-ending. Also gotta pump them numbers up for an IPO so they can bail with a pocket full of cash.

[–] EvilLootbox@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago

It's like how Netflix ended the basic no-ads plan to force people to either pay way more or pay a little less but be bombarded with ads. Serving ads is more profitable than letting people pay a little bit to skip them, apparently.

[–] kaitco@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

Gotta follow that Reddit formula… 🤦‍♀️

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I assume that's sarcasm, but no, they almost certainly aren't anywhere near probably from nitro subscriptions. I don't know how many employees they have, but they surely have a lot of developers working on all their features. And that cloud server time isn't cheap either, especially when you're handling video.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They could have stopped adding features years ago.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There's some weird corporate obsession with always constantly "innovating" and "improving". Adding complexity for the sake of complexity. Completely blind and oblivious to the fact that most consumers actually want something consistent that just does what they ask it to without much fuss, not just additional complexity.

Discord has added probably a hundred features since I started using it- ultimately, the only things I ever touch in the app are the same set of 5 that existed back in 2015 when I switched. Text, voice, basic file and image sharing, group servers, and (after they added it) video+screen sharing. Literally everything else is total fluff.

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Yup, it's sometimes called box-checking. "Look boss, I did a thing."

Often a thing nobody wanted or asked for.

[–] antler@feddit.rocks 7 points 7 months ago

$4 is probably way more than enough to cover the cost of your account, but the problem is what percentage of people are paying. If it's 1 in 100 or 1,000 and $4 covers 75 average accounts they might be in a bind.

[–] eco_game@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 7 months ago

Streaming, especially video, is quite challenging and expensive. The fact that discord's video streaming was so cheap was always somewhat suspicious.