Buildapc

3790 readers

5 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Lemmenmo@lemmy.world

SSD for Old Laptop (lemmy.world)

submitted 7 months ago by slingstone@lemmy.world to c/buildapc@lemmy.world

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm looking to replace the HDD on an HP Pavilion dv 6 6130-us. It has an i-3 2330M CPU. I know it's old as dirt, but I'd like to use it to run old games. It's also the only thing I own with a CD drive.

I've upgraded the RAM to the maximum it will support (16 GB). I'm thinking an SSD will help it run a great deal faster, but I'm stuck on what to get. So far, the Crucial MX500 seems like a good choice, but I'm wondering if any semi-reliable cheap SSD will do for something this old. I have to stick with something with a 2.5 inch form factor that uses SATA. Thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] oleorun@real.lemmy.fan 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Any old sata SSD will work fantastically. The MX500 is a fine choice. The Samsung SSD offerings are good too. I prefer the 980 series myself.

[–] slingstone@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Samsung seems like the gold standard, but the MX 500 seems more in line with what I want to pay on something this old. I was considering some like the Patriot Burst line or even some of the stuff on AliExpress, but some reviews I found scared me away from those.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You won't notice the higher speeds on the Samsung models. You might not even notice the speed difference between the Crucial vs whatever the cheapest option available at Micro Center, but this one is a bit tougher to say.

If you're ok with the Crucial MX500, it will be a huge upgrade.

Source: I upgraded a 3rd Gen laptop to the MX500 for occasional use while traveling. It's only recently that I'm considering buying a new one.

[–] slingstone@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

With an older machine, would it matter if I got a dram-less SSD? Would I notice a significant difference? I've seen a Teamgroup SSD (the T-force Vulcan Z) that's a bit cheaper, but it has no cache. It does appear to have a newer architecture though that appears to give it a longer life.