this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
215 points (95.4% liked)

Gaming

23440 readers
4 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 91 points 1 year ago (18 children)

You know who will give you money? Customers if you stop treating them like piñatas.

[–] PeachMan@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (16 children)

Valve is an excellent example of a company that is privately owned, so they don't have to satisfy shareholders with constant growth for growth's sake. And yet they're still growing and making a profit, because they make a good product.

Phil and Xbox don't have that luxury because their masters sold out decades ago.

[–] GnomeKat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Valve is also a good example of platform monopoly. People need to stop treating valve like they aren't also a big problem with the modern games industry. They are PC gaming's landlord taking a 30% cut of every sale. You have to be smoking crack if you think that doesn't hurt game developers.

[–] Aasikki@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Bullshit. That 30% cut pays for all the features that make steam a better store than any other store. Those features are all free for the gamers, because they are essentially paid by the devs in that cut.

If that cut wasn't worth it, I don't think Microsoft, ea and others would have come back to steam after trying to make their own stores (and failing).

How can it be a monopoly when I can just download another store with a click of a button? Which I have also done, and even bought games from those said other stores, but the experience was just completely miserable compared to steam, up to the point I've considered rebuying those games on Steam.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)