this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
153 points (96.4% liked)

Firefox

17849 readers
73 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Reading through the current Qwant privacy policy certainly doesn't alleviate any privacy concerns either....

Mozilla keeps building/buying, then abandoning things. I'm not sure if they're cut out for that project, and in my experience a SearX instance's effectiveness is mostly based on whether there are enough users for the data to be obfuscated, but so few that it doesn't get rate limited...

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Certainly some things are rate limited, Brave and Startpage are particularly bad for this. I omit them from my endjinns in Searx settings.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If you can use Google through SearX, isn't Startpage redundant? IIRC they don't ever claim to do anything but proxy Google results.

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

Yes, except in the case where Google is rate limited. There is/was a Searx instance that regularly got blocked by Google, I do not remember which one though.

[–] Kindness@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago

isn’t Startpage redundant?

After they were purchased by an advertising company? Yes.