this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
108 points (97.4% liked)

Weird News - Things that make you go 'hmmm'

942 readers
281 users here now

Rules:

  1. News must be from a reliable source. No tabloids or sensationalism, please.

  2. Try to keep it safe for work. Contact a moderator before posting if you have any doubts.

  3. Titles of articles must remain unchanged; however extraneous information like "Watch:" or "Look:" can be removed. Titles with trailing, non-relevant information can also be edited so long as the headline's intent remains intact.

  4. Be nice. If you've got nothing positive to say, don't say it.

Violators will be banned at mod's discretion.

Communities We Like:

-Not the Onion

-And finally...

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Nick Canon, is that you?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 30 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Lies would qualify as defamatory. But most guys talked about in groups like this are not added on a whim. And to have that many women mentioning him, there isn't much chance of all 27 lying. Hell, the fact that there even is 27 women that dated him that found the page... says alot.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Why? Just because a lot of people are saying bad stuff about you, doesn't mean it is true. Seeing how they mentioned verifiable things, like "he has an STD", they could easily be proven in court. The lawsuit exists because he didn't know those women, who were defaming him, to a group of 100k women. 27 out of 100k randos lying, especially moderators of the group? That doesn't seem unlikely, especially if you try to get a post "moving" so there isn't empty space for people who are asking about a dude.

[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The lawsuit exists because he didn't know those women, who were defaming him, to a group of 100k women.

Where did you see that?

[–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com -4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's in the article. The Facebook group was nationwide, not just local people.

[–] eatthecake@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

The article says the facebook group was local. It also says there is a nationwide network of similar groups. It doesn't say he didn't know the women and there is no evidence either way of who is lying. Given that facebook was made for men to judge and talk about women online i think it's high time it went the other way too.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Just because a lot of people are saying bad stuff about you, doesn't mean it is true.

It actually does. 27 people, chances are almost zero they are all randomly lying without any clear motive.

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Guy seems questionable, but I dunno man, Internet's weird. Snape Wives was a thing.

[–] TheWonderfool@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Oh absolutely. The article is very vague, but his behaviour seems quite fishy, based on the little information we have...

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

But most guys talked about in groups like this are not added on a whim

Most women are probably not posting on a whim, but there are certainly people out there who thrive on drama and enjoy lying about people just to get a thrill out of it.