this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
624 points (97.4% liked)

MST3K

895 readers
1 users here now

Rules/guidelines/info

You know you want links, baby!

This community is hosted at https://lemmy.world/c/mst3k and moderated by:

If you were a mod on /r/MST3K give me a shout.

Confused about Lemmy/Fediverse? Here's a useful infographic

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
sanguinepar@lemmy.world
ety3rd@lemmy.world
624
Finally, an answer! (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/mst3k@lemmy.world
228 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

(I know this is about Rifftrax, but we don't have a Rifftrax community.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

ROFLMAO! You literally appealed to a bot to try and circumnavigate your incoherence?

Holy crap... even the "wall-of-text" arguments tankies use is less sad than this. The white liberals trying to justify white supremacism by appealing to dictionary descriptions is less sad than this.

Good job breaking it, hero.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You literally appealed to a bot to try and circumnavigate your incoherence?

I asked an objective source if it made sense. Not only did it say it made sense, breaking it down and explaining what each part meant, it even called it clever.

And you're still trying to argue that it was incoherent. lol. You're a fucking joke. I thought, considering it had been so long since you responded, that even you are smart enough to realize that an argument against this was ridiculously stupid. Yet, apparently, I was wrong. You actually stupid enough to try and argue against it.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I asked an objective source if it made sense.

No. You didn't. You asked a bot, genius.

You don't even have the pretense of credibility left to appeal to, liberal.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Lol how does it being a bot make it not an objective source?

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Is this your idea of "objective," genius?

No wonder you're incapable of spotting your own blatant incoherence - you wouldn't know "objective" if it were to bite you on your arrse.

[–] ety3rd@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

We only have a few rules here ... one of them is "be nice to each other." So knock this off.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Lol. You don't know the difference between being accurate and objective. One has zero to do with the other. You should be utterly embarrassed that I have to explain this to you.

The fact that it was wrong about something else has zero bearing on whether it's objective about our debate. And considering it accurately described my point, brining up that it was wrong about something else makes even less sense.

You can't possibly be this dumb. If you're just trolling, what do you get out of looking like a complete idiot? I don't get it.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You should be utterly embarrassed

I'm not the one that asked an AI bot to do my thinking for me, genius - that's you.

[–] ety3rd@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We only have a few rules here ... one of them is "be nice to each other." So knock this off.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Can I ask why you're even down here? I deleted my last post because you asked nicely for me to knock it off,so I will, but if someone reported me, and not the other poster, then it's obvious the other poster and thus it's obvious they are just baiting with the attempt of getting people banned.

[–] ety3rd@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Both of you were reported; both were given the same message.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Ok cool, just checking. Thanks for the response