Baldur's Gate 3

6250 readers

168 users here now

All things BG3!

Baldur’s Gate 3 is a story-rich, party-based RPG set in the universe of Dungeons & Dragons, where your choices shape a tale of fellowship and betrayal, survival and sacrifice, and the lure of absolute power. (Website)

Spoilers

If your post contains any possible spoilers, please:

Use the text [SPOILER] at the beginning of your title, do not include any spoilers in the title.
Use the appropriate spoiler markup to conceal that content in the body of your post.

Thank you!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

ThayWizGwar@lemmy.world

Rusty_Red@lemm.ee

143

A Perfect Storm - what a crock of shit (lemmy.talung.org)

submitted 1 year ago by talung@lemmy.talung.org to c/baldurs_gate_3@lemmy.world

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This is what I am hearing endlessly about why Baldur's Gate 3 is a success. I say that's a crock of shit sold by bad companies and developers and an insult to Larians hard work.

These are the things for my opinion:

They have 20 years of experience making CRPGS with the Divinity series
They do Early Access to test and perfect their systems
The listen to customer feedback and distill the good from the bad, ending up with a better product
They don't insult their customers and respect them
No microtransactions or Day 1 DLC, or mention of upcoming DLC and Season Pass
They hire Writers, Composers and Developers BASED ON MERIT!
You can see the love they put in the games from the Panels from Hell and social media

I am sure there are many more things that add to their success but random chance and luck is not the reason; hard work, dedication and good management is!

Just a little rant and pet peave I wanted to get off my chest.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] talung@lemmy.talung.org -28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Huh? I literally said in my post that I’ve never run into an instance of someone not being hired by their merit. I don’t understand how anyone could not hire someone if they didn’t have talent and passion, so we are in agreement there, unless you have a different definition of merit.

This is lucky for you, I have not been so lucky and had to be forced to train people that did not have the ability to do the job but were hired solely based on other factors even though their were better candidates. But of course YOUR experience invalidates everything else.

Did I even mention all the stuff in the game? If fact It even said it was GOOD WRITING by QUALIFIED people. No I did not... again projection on your part trying to force a narrative that is not there.

My point always has been and will be.. Hire on merit and not to fit quotas. This is not political or any such thing, it again is YOUR projection for YOUR narrative.

[–] pseudo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

This is lucky for you, I have not been so lucky and had to be forced to train people that did not have the ability to do the job but were hired solely based on other factors even though their were better candidates.

The thumb-twiddling industry is on a hiring spree?

[–] Morgikan@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

This is lucky for you, I have not been so lucky and had to be forced to train people that did not have the ability to do the job but were hired solely based on other factors even though their were better candidates. But of course YOUR experience invalidates everything else.

Just because that was YOUR experience doesn't mean it invalidates what, based on consensus, is coming practice which is merit based hires. Sorry you had that problem, but that alone does not make it an industry wide problem.