Privacy

31930 readers

704 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

EM Eye: Electromagnetic Side-channel Eavesdropping on Embedded Cameras (emeyeattack.github.io)

submitted 7 months ago by tavu@sopuli.xyz to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

EM Eye investigates a cybersecurity attack where the attackers eavesdrop on the confidential video data of cameras by parsing the unintentional electromagnetic leakage signals from camera circuits. This happens on the physical/analog layer of camera systems and thus allows attackers to steal victim's camera data even when perfect software protections (e.g., unbreakable passwords) are all in place. Exploiting the eavesdropped videos, attackers can spy on privacy-sensitive information such as people's activities in an enclosed room recorded by the victim's home security camera. [...]

Paper.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] potatopotato@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

$250 per camera that you have to be within meters of best case. That doesn't include the packaging cost to make this look innocuous so probably significantly more money if you wanted this to be stealthy and reliable. Add in the money for the distribution and "installation" of such devices.

This doesn't scale at all.

[–] tavu@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well within the budget of a private investigator or burglar or peeping-tom or abusive ex-partner.

No need to scale; plenty of privacy/security incursions don't require mass-surveillance.

That said, I'd suggest that the attack does scale economically . Think war-driving but with one of these setups -- cruising around in a van through a dense neighbourhood collecting short clips of cctv footage looking for something of interest.

[–] potatopotato@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah, I'd agree with that.

The point I was making was for people who thought this was cellphone cameras and that it would somehow work even if the camera wasn't actively running.

As far as war driving with an sdr you'd probably occasionally find something interesting, but the vast majority would be cameras just pointed back out at the street. I think you'd mostly see stuff where if you wanted to spy it would make more sense to hide your own camera because it's already public.

All that said, I would lose my shit if Hollywood did something believable for once and used this for a heist movie.