289
submitted 3 months ago by sandro_linux@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tomatolung@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Arguably. Reading the comments on avhearld, the cowling latches to each other rather than to the frame and the latches themselves are very low and easy to miss. Airbus has tried to eliminate this potential oversight, whereas Boeing has not. So yes, potentially missed non walk around, but also a possible systematic design failure.

https://avherald.com/h?article=51721379&opt=0

[-] invno1@lemmy.one 1 points 2 months ago

Not arguably, still a maintaine issue with the owner of the plane.

[-] tomatolung@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Failures of design can lead to maintenance failures. Where as maintenance failures do not always stem from failures of design.

So not mutually exclusive in this case.

[-] invno1@lemmy.one 1 points 2 months ago

First sentence is true. Last sentence is not. We'll see.

this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
289 points (97.7% liked)

World News

31482 readers
821 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS