this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
174 points (98.9% liked)

Privacy

32159 readers
885 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] drkt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Servers aren't free but it's damn cheap if you don't bloat up your backend

[–] huginn@feddit.it 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

And the way you don't bloat your backend?

Expensive engineers

[–] drwho@beehaw.org 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How expensive do we have to be for them to actually listen to us for a change? Or do you mean "expensive consultants?"

[–] huginn@feddit.it 6 points 7 months ago

Well yeah this presupposes that management knows what the fuck they're doing.

Which is vanishingly rare. It happens sometimes though. I worked at a small 12 man shop that had an engineer CEO who valued doing things right. Very refreshing.

[–] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

Throwing more bodies at a situation does NOT solve the situation faster or more efficiently; seriously, this shit is the most remedial, 101-level shit in pretty much any field where man-hours are a measuring metric.

[–] dsemy@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

That's probably why he wrote "expensive" and not "more".

[–] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml -4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

It's almost like he pluralized something implying "go get more". I'm not playing semantic gymnastics with you tech"bro" ballbags this morning

[–] dsemy@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Idk I immediately understood what he meant, no need to be so rude about it

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

Probably having a bad day and is angry at something else, but lashing out online. Happens all the time.

Anti Commercial AI thingyCC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] huginn@feddit.it 2 points 7 months ago

Expensive engineers is a category dipshit.

You add an S to a noun in English to show it's a category or grouping instead of a specific individual.

Learn to fucking read. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_category

[–] huginn@feddit.it 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

That's not what I said or even remotely implied.

If you want a good back end that isn't bloated you can't use cheap contractors or junior engineers - you need someone who knows what they're doing.

It's a fight I'm constantly fighting at work. They finally dropped all the super cheap contractors that were trying to hard code a list of 20 identical entries that differed only by a single field. The contractors who thought the peak of architectural design was decomposition of any method more than 5 lines long into confusingly named functions that had an additional 10 layers of decomposition to them. The cheap contractors who thought that documentation was a waste of time and that the code was "self documenting".

These contractors weren't paid to care - I don't blame them for phoning it in. But if you want a system to work well and be cheap to run you pay your engineers well or inspire such devotion that FOSS is possible.

But the fact is the overwhelming majority of large, optimized and successful FOSS is funded by megacorps

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The cheap contractors who thought that documentation was a waste of time and that the code was “self documenting”.

Unfortunately, there are expensive engineers who think the same 😦 I don't know how they pass technical interviews or probationary periods.

Anti Commercial AI thingyCC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] huginn@feddit.it 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Definitely - hiring isn't easy.

But you'll never get value for money from engineers who don't care, and you have a 0% chance of a cheap contractor caring.

Again - I don't blame them. They shouldn't care. The company clearly doesn't respect them.

But it's a false economy.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Again - I don’t blame them. They shouldn’t care. The company clearly doesn’t respect them.

True. Some people aren't paid enough to care 👍

But it’s a false economy.

Is that a typo or a term I don't know?

Anti Commercial AI thingyCC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] huginn@feddit.it 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Not a typo - a false economy is a decision that saves money in the short term but wastes more than it saves in the long term.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 2 points 7 months ago

Thank you, learned something new!

Anti Commercial AI thingyCC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Inserted with a keystroke running this script on linux with X11

#!/usr/bin/env nix-shell
#!nix-shell -i bash --packages xautomation xclip

sleep 0.2
(echo '
spoiler Anti Commercial AI thingy [CC BY-NC-SA 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) Inserted with a keystroke running this script on linux with X11 ```bash' cat "$0" echo '``` :::') | xclip -selection clipboard xte "keydown Control_L" "key V" "keyup Control_L"

:::

[–] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml -3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

says a thing

"no I didn't say that thing"

average day on feddit 🙄

[–] huginn@feddit.it 3 points 7 months ago

optimizing backend services is expensive because good engineers are expensive

um acktually you can't build services faster by hiring tons of people 🤓🤓

Reading comprehension: you lack it.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 2 points 7 months ago

Either you get:

  • many engineers --> lots of money
  • some good/very good/excellent engineers --> lots of money

Either way, it's expensive.

Anti Commercial AI thingyCC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] PrunesMakeYouPoop@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago

Seriously, you can't have nine pregnant women and expect one baby in one month.