this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
3 points (80.0% liked)

Socialism

6004 readers
20 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is the morality of the Slave State, applied in circumstances totally unlike those in which it arose. No wonder the result has been disastrous. Let us take an illustration. Suppose that at a given moment a certain number of people are engaged in the manufacture of pins. They make as many pins as the world needs, working (say) eight hours a day. Someone makes an invention by which the same number of men can make twice as many pins as before. But the world does not need twice as many pins: pins are already so cheap that hardly any more will be bought at a lower price. In a sensible world everybody concerned in the manufacture of pins would take to working four hours instead of eight, and everything else would go on as before. But in the actual world this would be thought demoralizing. The men still work eight hours, there are too many pins, some employers go bankrupt, and half the men previously concerned in making pins are thrown out of work. There is, in the end, just as much leisure as on the other plan, but half the men are totally idle while half are still overworked. In this way it is insured that the unavoidable leisure shall cause misery all round instead of being a universal source of happiness. Can anything more insane be imagined?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] putoelquelolea@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (18 children)

Yes, with three caveats:

  1. The pin factories would need to continue paying all their employees a full salary for a half-day of work.

  2. Someone - or some entity - would need to enforce point number one, as this measure goes against the general principles of administrative efficiency.

  3. Whatever entity assumes the power of dictating counter-intuitive administration policies, inevitably begs the question: Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

In the end, you would only substitute the tyranny of the bourgeoise for the tyranny of interventionism

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yeah, while I am sympathetic to the point, this thought experiment is easily observable to not be anywhere close to how the world actually functions.

But yes, Capitalism is functionally a manifestation of various forms of material and labor scarcity. It is trivial to demonstrate that markets break down at both scarcity extremes.

[–] putoelquelolea@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah, that adds some spice to the discussion! How does the scarcity of pins and labor fit into the scenario? And how does the perspective change as we enter a post-scarcity world?

load more comments (16 replies)