1773
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lukas@lemmy.haigner.me 29 points 11 months ago

You hold artificial intelligence to the standards of general artificial intelligence, which doesn't even exist yet. Even dumb decision trees are considered an AI. You have to lower your expectations. Calling the best AIs we have dumb is unhelpful at best.

[-] Poob@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago

We never called if statements AI until the last year or so. It's all marketing buzz words. It has to be more than just "it makes a decision" to be AI, or else rivers would be AI because they "make a decision" on which path to take to the ocean based on which dirt is in the way.

[-] MajorHavoc@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah, and highlighting that difference is what is important right now.

This is the first AI to masquerade as general artificial intelligence and people are getting confused.

This current thing doesn't have or need rights or ethics. It can't produce new intellectual property. It's not going to save Timmy when he falls into the well. We're going to need a new Timmy before all this is over

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
1773 points (98.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

31259 readers
830 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS