this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
40 points (95.5% liked)
Books
4531 readers
26 users here now
A community for all things related to Books.
Rules
- Be Nice
Official Bingo Posts:
Related Communities
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Significantly longer than the original novel, so scanning alone would take a very long time and I don't even have a scanner.
There are companies specializing in document management. One of the services they offer (besides archiving, secure destruction, etc.) is scanning books and creating high-quality pdfs of their contents. This is usually a (semi-)automated process that uses a machine that opens the book only as much as necessary, to try not to even damage its spine. I’ve used it professionally and can vouch for this kind of service, even if I cannot really recommend you a particular provider, since I very much doubt you live near me, in Europe. Still, I’m pretty sure you can find one close to you if you search.
This will only take you halfway there, by producing a good quality pdf version of the book that you could share with others. To go the extra step of OCR’ing it, proofreading, adding the links, would need something else…
Thanks. Can you recommend a reputable one?
I’ve used these guys. Fast, courteous and acceptable price. Still, unless you live in Portugal, I don’t think it will help you much. Might give you an idea of what to look for, though!
GASDA
Ah, yeah, not in Portugal. But I appreciate you giving me a direction to look in, thank you!
As someone who has dabbled in genealogy, even a simple phone scan can be appreciated by the right audience. I always preferred transcription and OCR of course, but that first jump from "not online" to "online" was always a huge relief.
That makes sense, but this is more about providing a scholarly work in an easy-to-access format, which would necessarily include a lot of hyperlinks since it was an annotation.
As far as just preserving it for family, we have multiple copies.
I'm just suggesting that, if it is a book, the people who might be interested in using it will be happy that it is at least available in its original state, and that the effort to cross-reference will be a bonus, not a critical feature.
If there are copies hiding in academic libraries, then fair play, no real need, but if there is literally nowhere else to get your dad's book, I think the universe of people interested in a scholarly analysis of a novel would welcome whatever they can get and keep a copy of the novel open on their desk or in another window. The genealogy angle was more tangential to that. :-)