Privacy

32103 readers

559 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

328

Cops can force suspect to unlock phone with thumbprint, US court rules (arstechnica.com)

submitted 7 months ago by TaviRider@reddthat.com to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

121 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The legal situation is more complex and nuanced than the headline implies, so the article is worth reading. This adds another ruling to the confusing case history regarding forced biometric unlocking.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Eh, I never stopped using a password for this exact reason.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I think this solution is way too impractical for most people, who tend to unlock their phone many times a day.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's the cost of good security practices. You always sacrifice convenience.

[–] HumanPerson@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

I wish I could have a fingerprint and a pin with a limited number of attempts. Plus a password after like three failed pin attempts. I think that would be a pretty good balance between security and convenience.

[–] OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I mean, it is annoying. But it's security. Don't want people having access to your device, remove all possibility someone CAN.

But it is annoying, we shouldn't HAVE to do this. Privacy should be baked right into our daily lives and not clawed out with tired hands every chance we get.

[–] TaviRider@reddthat.com 2 points 7 months ago

Yeah. The huge legal distinctions between different ways of unlocking a device seem absurd. Comprehensive privacy legislation would help.