UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1202 readers

13 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.

New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide

Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.

Community Spotlight

Useful Links

Community Rules

Follow the Code of Conduct.
Posts must be on-topic.
No duplicate posts.
No commercial activity.
No memes.
Titles must accurately represent the content of the submission.
Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post).
Common Question posts must include a link to the previous question thread if previously asked.
Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
Off-topic political discussion may be removed at moderator discretion.

Other Communities

!uapmemes@lemmy.world

If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SignullGone@lemmy.world

HM05_Me@lemmy.world

Christopher Mellon: Another Signal Exchange... (christopherkmellon.substack.com)

submitted 4 months ago by HM05_Me@lemmy.world to c/uap@lemmy.world

1 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] HM05_Me@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Christopher Mellon has released snippets of a Signal exchange with an unknown individual who claims knowledge of "an alleged U.S. alien technology recovery and exploitation program". This is following the FOIA release of a Signal exchange between Mellon and then AARO head, Sean Kirkpatrick over David Grusch. While this new information is otherwise unsubstantiated to the public, Mellon's record speaks volumes for his trust in the individual's claims. This shouldn't serve as direct proof of the existence of these programs, but instead proof that there is a systemic issue within the government of concealment and mistrust which requires investigation. If the allegations are true, then they should be unearthed in the process of obtaining transparency.