this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
1549 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

59440 readers
3572 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
1549
FCC restores net neutrality rules that ban blocking and throttling in 3-2 vote (arstechnica.com)
submitted 6 months ago by ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
159 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The Federal Communications Commission voted 3–2 to impose net neutrality rules today, restoring the common-carrier regulatory framework enforced during the Obama era and then abandoned while Trump was president.

The rules prohibit Internet service providers from blocking and throttling lawful content and ban paid prioritization.

"Consumers have made clear to us they do not want their broadband provider cutting sweetheart deals, with fast lanes for some services and slow lanes for others," FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel said at today's meeting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

it probably means that they would have to upgrade their little bunny hopping network technology that has about 300ms latency end to end, because god forbid you roll out a simple technology and have an easy time maintaining it.

Which is probably why they do it.

[–] III@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Upgrade infrastructure?! No, no. That money needs to go to shareholders. There's no way millions of people need decent internet speeds more than shareholders need their 12th yacht.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago

you mean to tell me that rolling out fiber is cheap and that servicing it end to end is also cheap and that the latency and speeds it provides keeps customers happy meaning we have to spend less time dealing with them?

That's cool, call me when i care.

sincerely, your local ISP.