this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
47 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

17530 readers
8 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Shimitar@feddit.it 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I strongly agree with the author. But at the same time nobody can and should block Meta from joining.

Will that kill all this?

[–] fiasco@possumpat.io 3 points 1 year ago

Individual instance owners can block Meta instances from federating (exchanging data), and they absolutely, 100% should do so. If enough instances block Meta, it'll be like they don't even exist.

The bigger issue is that corporations can present a united front, while federations cannot. This is why hegemonic forces tend to win; as the author says, there's already division among kbin/Lemmy users about whether blocking Meta is a good idea. You can be damn sure there isn't similar division among Facebook leadership about whether to destroy kbin/Lemmy.

[–] emptyother@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The teaching I get from this is: Dont let Meta dictate the protocol. As soon as they become incompatible, let them stay incompatible until they follow. And be happy with the users who were smart enough to stay with the reliable platform.

[–] UrbenLegend@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

This won't work if Meta gains enough users to swing their weight around. Microsoft does the same thing with Embrace, Extend, Extinguish and it's not something to just ignore.