this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
885 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

59985 readers
2104 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Numberone@startrek.website 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (7 children)

Is linked to excess deaths? Technically it could be saving lives at a population scale. I doubt that's the case, but it could be. I'll read the article now and find out.

Edit: it doesn't seem to say anything regarding "normal" auto related deaths. They're focusing on the bullshit designation of an unfinished product as "autopilot",and a (small) subset of specific cases that are particularly aggregious, where there were 5-10 seconds of lead time into an incident. In these cases a person who was paying attention wouldn't have been in the accident.

Also some clarity edits.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (5 children)
[–] Tja@programming.dev 6 points 7 months ago (3 children)

OP should come back in one hour and say "nvm, I found out".

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well, you kissed an opportunity for some Lols and gave us boring information instead. Boo!

[–] Numberone@startrek.website 2 points 7 months ago

And now you know something about me😋

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)