115
For 'Cheap' Labour, Google Fires Its Entire Python Team: Report
(www.freepressjournal.in)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
115 points (72.4% liked)
Technology
55647 readers
3641 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
What an incoherent mess of an article.
Probably AI written
"According to reports from sources that produce news on such matters, this is critical,..."
That was incoherent for me.
Birds aren't real according to sources that make claims that birds aren't real.
That one is true, though. It’s like when we learned squirrels violate all known laws of physics and are actually part of an elaborate conspiracy to collect acorns and corner the market on oak saplings.
But what percentage of fake birds are real fake birds?
Typical....
Likewise
Which is part of why I'm thinking it was AI written
It's perfectly coherent, it's just blather.
Blather is defined as talk long-windedly without making very much sense. Not making very much sense to me is incoherence. Your logic knife is so sharp your cutting yourself.
I don't think that's nonsensical so much as redundantly redundant
and
These just scream AI-written to me. Especially the second one. Nobody talks or writes like that. If you don't have sources to mention, you don't mention sources.
Inglish