Technology

59656 readers

2645 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

515

30% of Children Ages 5-7 Are on TikTok (www.honest-broker.com)

submitted 7 months ago by boem@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

234 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 15 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Children can't do that if you're a responsible parent that keeps an eye on what their child is doing. Y'know, the bare minimum of parenting.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

if you're a responsible parent that keeps an eye on what their child is doing.

Unfortunately you can't run a society based on how people should behave. That's the entire reason we have a legal system and the means to implement safeguards for our population.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Imagine not realizing that people have to work for a living... Or that adult mental health is at an all time low. Or that social media manipulation affects people who are parents as well as their kids.

Similarly just kicking the problem down the road like you're doing doesn't actually solve it. It just inhibits solutions and contributes to the problem.

So in this instance people that think like your comment states actually are indirectly part of the problem. Which is ironic.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's sort of true, but "rules for thee and not for me" just kicks the can down the road. They're going to copy you, so it's really important to set a good example, at least when your kids can see you.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It’s not “rules for thee and not for me,” unless you consider that true for things like drinking alcohol. It’s protecting children from something they are not cognitively developed enough to be dealing with.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The difference is that it's easy to point to reasons why a child shouldn't be drinking alcohol (illegal, liver immaturity, etc), and less easy to point to why they shouldn't be on social media, esp. if their friends are using it.

Where the line is more fuzzy, I think parents should set a more strict standard for themselves, at least in front of their children.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think the line is, TikTok pulls a video at random it thinks you’ll want to watch. This means that you may be exposed to basically anything a person felt like filming. This includes violent or pornographic content, which children should not be exposed to.

Being a parent is telling your children no sometimes. Being a parent means that you should vet the media that your child is being exposed to, which is impossible on a platform like TikTok, and sometimes make the decision for them that they are not old enough to be exposed to certain material.

It really feels like folks don’t want to be parents - they want to hand the iPad over to the screaming toddler so that they can be babysat by their own phone. I don’t understand why one would have children, if they weren’t interested in doing the work of parenting those kids.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago

My thoughts exactly.

I will say, however, that I'm generally against content filtering. My kids know the rules, and they know if they violate them, they lose device privileges. Simple as that. If I put parental controls on, they'll just circumvent them (and I'll teach them how to if they ask). I know because I was a kid and constantly got around stupid content filters at school.

Either I trust them with the device, or I don't, no half-measures. For example:

TV - "kids" profiles, but they're free to use our "adult" profiles if the filtering sucks
computers and tablets - they ask for access, tell me what they want to do, and I unlock it for them
Switch - child lock, but only because my 4yo keeps taking it when not allowed; my older kids know the code

That's it. I generally allow them to use devices unsupervised, though in a public area so I can walk over and check on them. I intend to give them their own devices as they get older (i.e. they'll set their own passwords). But if they violate my trust, it's their fault, not the content filter's, and they lose privileges.