this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
2 points (54.5% liked)

UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1202 readers
13 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.


New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide


Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.


Community Spotlight

Featured Posts and User Investigations


Useful Links


Community Rules


Other Communities

!uapmemes@lemmy.world


If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] HM05_Me@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Wishful thinking, I know.

With the progress of technology, it really is difficult these days to grasp what the military is capable of. We keep breaking grounds of what we previously considered possible. Though there have been reports for decades of object maneuvering that we still haven't publicly replicated or properly explained. Assuming any of those reports to be true, that either suggests there is an external factor, such as NHI, or the government has been concealing groundbreaking technology for way too long.

Some plausible scenarios I've come across that tie in with your second point are...

  • The government has documented UAP this whole time, but doesn't have a comfortable grasp on what it is. Revealing that could be seen as a vulnerability, so they'd rather dismiss it than appear weak to the nation and world.
  • They've recovered technology of NHI or unknown origin and have been reverse engineering it for decades. The silence on it would then be to keep the advancements between the DOD and private contractors to benefit from. And/or, to cover potential illegal activity in the acquisition and monopoly of the technology.

There are a lot more scenarios I've seen, but these seem the most plausible and accessible.

[โ€“] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

many possibilities, few I want to contemplate :|