this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
1597 points (98.8% liked)

linuxmemes

21311 readers
455 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     

    Source

    alt-text

    I can't believe a paid OS needs a tool like this. Here's a GUI tool called OFGB (Oh Frick Go Back) to remove all the ads in Windows 11. It's understandable if a free OS or app needs ad support, but this is just crazy github.com/xM4ddy/OFGB

    [Screenshot Of a GUI Tool To Removes Ads From Various Places Around Windows 11]

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    At this point it would be easier to install a new user friendly linux distro...

    [–] drislands@lemmy.world 65 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    I love Linux as much as the next guy, but installing a new OS is not easier than downloading a single program and clicking check boxes. No need to be hyperbolic, Windows is bad enough as it is.

    [–] K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

    Yeah it is easier dude. with windows you have to install the new OS and then open edge and download Firefox then go download the program and check the boxes. With linux mint you install the OS. Idk sounds easier to me

    [–] drislands@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

    Well, that's fair. I thought you meant easier to install Linux over an existing Windows 11 install.

    [–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    Maybe, but Windows has the advantage of being preinstalled on the hardware most people are buying (meaning they get to skip the install the OS step for Windows).

    [–] K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    I wouldn't call forced adoption an advantage. if anything they are taking away your freedom of choice by making it harder for you to switch, Because you have to remove the windows OS to switch. Why dont you get the option for linux at the store they are open source licensed so there is no issue distributing for free and giving people the option.

    [–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 6 months ago

    Sure sure, but we're talking ease of use for a typical end user. Also, Firefox isn't mandatory for the other app, so you technically don't need to add that step even if getting away from Chromium in general and Edge in particular is a good idea as regards avoiding advertising.

    [–] CCF_100@sh.itjust.works 30 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    It boggles my mind how many Windows users refuse to switch to something else and insist on patching together Microsoft's intentionally broken excuse of an operating system...

    [–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    The usual, I would but games (and proprietary software for work)

    I run a Linux machine literally next to my Windows desktop and yeah it's 98% for my daily usually but that's still a week worth of "Not working" for my year.

    Fallout 3 was hard enough to get working on Windows many moons ago but even with all the "Use Lutris" or "Use Heroic" cries, it'd be easier to run a whole Windows VM than to get it running natively and in the forty minutes of time I have to game, I'd rather just play the game sometimes.

    So, if I have to play in their Sandbox, I'm gonna shit in it first so they don't try to come play too.

    Plus, VR and all that.

    [–] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

    That's why my windows partition is still in regular use. I play apex legends. It used to play flawlessly on pop is but over a year ago at this point it started screwing up.

    I'd usually be able to get it working after a while, but when I have 30-45 minutes or maybe an hour at most to game, I don't want to spend all of it "fixing". I'd rather restart into windows and be playing in a minute.

    [–] z00s@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    Sometimes you don't know how bad your ex really is until you're in a new relationship

    [–] CCF_100@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago

    😔 ain't that the truth

    [–] whome@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 6 months ago

    For me it's simply laziness, and the fact that I don't use the OS apart from explorer. I think that's the thing for a lot of people the actively use so few parts of the OS that the question wether the OS is intrusive, bloatware free or efficient isn't part of their concern. They, me included, don't tinker, don't optimize, don't script etc. I just start the programs thati use. I probably will give Linux another go with my next PC build though.

    [–] Theharpyeagle@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    The truth is that most people don't really care. A lot of them don't even know what an OS is, they just need a machine that lets them browse the internet, write documents, and maybe play some games. An ad is maybe an annoyance to them, but not one that's going to make them install a new OS. It's not because they're dumb or ignorant, it just doesn't rank that high on their list of priorities (even if we think it should). I think being in these communities kind of makes us forget that a lot of people don't think that much about tech.

    I do think that easy to install/use Linux distros could one day start changing some minds, but that distro won't be one that's popular with current Linux users. You'd basically need something that very rarely requires you to touch a terminal, even for troubleshooting, because that's where people will nope right out.

    On the other hand, this is why stuff like that "look at all the data Google has on you" video are important. For us it's a yeah duh moment, but the average Chromebook user probably has no idea and is rightly surprised about it. Reach people in terms they can understand.

    [–] Charzard4261@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago

    Absolutely this. 99% of people I know never want to touch a terminal, and I don't blame them. They've been shown that what they want to do can be simple, why would they settle for less? Something really big needs to happen for them to change browser, let alone a whole OS.

    [–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 months ago

    The devil you know vs the devil you don't, I guess. Comfort etc.

    [–] K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 months ago

    Lol right I saw a post about tiny11 iso I was like wtf thats way harder then just installing linux. Microsoft got people brainwashed