Obviously it depends on the quality of the information, doesn't it

like if it's some rando just bullshitting, that's gonna be obvious

if he's dropping insider secrets or sounding authoritative, that requires investigation

but we're a bit past all that right

Like you are aware of the wider context of what often happens to whistleblowers, time and again, ... like you're not just in here shooting your mouth off right, you know something about it when you deign to ask such a glib question? Or have you done none of your homework and just wanted to bless us with the annoying noise you made?