this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
863 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

58096 readers
3237 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nindelofocho@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

That explosion doesent seem much bigger than a firework thats smaller than the battery’s size. With as much as a car weighs and the amount we already do to protect batteries in electric cars i imagine the explosion from these could be easier to manage safely than a lithium fire. I also wonder how harmful the fumes are compared to lithium

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Especially considering there's no fire from a sodium cell, just a quick bang. They definitely seem a lot safer.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We already know how to take care of this in big capacitors. You put a breakaway vent in.

[–] cybersin@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

Yep, cylindrical Li-ion cells like the 18650 already do this.

[–] cybersin@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

Yep, less/no fire is very important when creating battery banks with many cells. The probability of single cell failure spreading to adjacent cells is reduced, making a catastrophic failure of the entire bank less likely.

[–] soEZ@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

My hopes of flying cars has been dashed 😐