this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
135 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

34904 readers
285 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SimonSaysStuff@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I can vouch for the performance hit - I used to have a Surfacebook 2 and with Bitlocker enabled the machine was unusable. I'd say the performance hit was significantly higher than 45%. Turning it off at least allowed me to have a functioning laptop.

The same hardware then ran Linux with full disk encryption enabled and performance was night and day.

[–] VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It has been many years since I've used an OS without full disk encryption, so I can't really compare, but I have a Windows Partition for some proprietary software that doesn't like Wine on my PC, and it is really smooth. Might be because it's on a NVME SSD, though.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz -5 points 6 months ago

65% of 5 GBps is still faster than most people need