this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
74 points (91.1% liked)

UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1233 readers
1 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.


New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide


Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.


Community Spotlight

Featured Posts and User Investigations


Useful Links


Community Rules


Other Communities

!uapmemes@lemmy.world


If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bquintb@midwest.social -5 points 6 months ago (8 children)

Because they did. It's beyond obvious by now there are objects in the skies that are either way beyond our known level of tech, or ...what? Aliens? Whatever they are.

[–] HM05_Me@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (4 children)

People are dismissing the idea, but sightings by members of our own military suggest objects with movements that can't be obtained by known technology. That's on top of decades of public sightings that support the idea of something more out there. People hear mention of aliens and would rather dismiss the conversation as science fiction than explore idea of it. Even if it isn't alien or non-human, there are sightings that warrant investigation and answers to the public.

This is an issue that deserves debate and not ridicule. It should be perfectly fine for people to present ideas like extraterrestrial/non-human life when examining an unknown phenomenon. Documented sightings and science will get to the root of what they are, but in the meantime speculation is what helps fuel the curiosity to learn more.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And sailors of old were convinced they saw mermaids too. This is just as dumb.

[–] HM05_Me@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

I agree with the analogy, but not in your conclusion. Those were often animals that were misidentified. Even in your analogy you cite something observed that deserves research. Should we have ignored tales of mermaids and folk creatures that lead to the identification and study of new animals? I think it's absurd to say that you should ignore something because you view it as a tall tale. I'm simply saying to let people speculate and let science determine what truth is.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)