Technology

58138 readers

4364 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

590

Report: Microsoft to face antitrust case over Teams (arstechnica.com)

submitted 4 months ago by lemmee_in@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

126 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

how resource heavy and slow for what it is, how notifications break a lot of the time, how obtuse and unintuitive it usually is to do some simple stuff like sharing meetings and how everything thats not an absolute core feature will glitch out 8 times out of 10.

i'm sure some of these were fixed while they broke other stuff, they fuck around with it all the time. im thankfully not being forced to use it for a while right now.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 7 points 4 months ago

To add: how I have "2 unread messages", but nothing when filtered for unread. My phone will forever have 2 unread messages.

[–] LinusSexTips@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

We used Teams at the last org I worked at, we rarely had issues. The UI wasn't bad in my eyes, we had integrated our phone system into teams too. Calling someone on the other side of the country via teams was simple.

Admittedly the service did get worse before I left and there were a couple of Microsoft outages which cut all our text based communications for a day (phone system still worked)

I'm using slack right now but would prefer something self-hosted but that's well out of the scope of the current mob I'm with.

[–] arcayne 2 points 4 months ago

If you ever reach a point where self-hosting does become a possibility, I'd recommend checking out Mattermost.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not sure how long it's been since your last org, but a lot has changed in the Teams universe as of late (and mostly not for the better).

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Eh, it works pretty well in our org. We use it for almost all of our meetings, and we have pretty much no issues. Then again, our entire team is on macOS and we have it integrated at the corporate level (so meeting rooms and whatnot use it), and it's a pretty solid experience.

My main complaints are:

chats absolutely suck
seems to use a bunch of resources
people we interview seem to have issues (I'm guessing the webapp sucks?)

We use Slack for text communication and impromptu video chats, so the chat issues don't bother me all that much.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

so your main complaints are that its most basic usecase sucks, but it works quite well. which is it?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Chats are not the most basic use case for Teams, meetings are. And meetings work pretty well.