this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
27 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1436 readers
157 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid!

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post, there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] saucerwizard@awful.systems 12 points 6 months ago (13 children)
[–] slopjockey@awful.systems 14 points 6 months ago (3 children)
[–] self@awful.systems 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

introducing the human brain to utilitarianism is a lot like introducing a proof system to Falso

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 6 points 6 months ago

Falso

Quality shitpost, top tier SIGBOVIK content, especially appreciate this:

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

ah yes, aduhelm (aducanumab), probably first drug that FDA approved despite zero evidence that it works, but they wanted to push something, anything that maybe perhaps will show some marginal benefit (it was discontinued few months ago, but in time it was for sale they raked in some serious undeserved money). understandably this made a lot of people very angry, especially people that make drugs that work https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/aducanumab-approval https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/goodbye-aduhelm

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 6 months ago

and can you guess why it was discontinued? it's because that company has new, equally useless antibody, that also got approval, but has none of that pr stink around so they can repeat entire process again

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 5 points 6 months ago

Literally one of the Vogons talked about in the opening, well done substackcommenter2048.

load more comments (9 replies)