Archived version: https://archive.ph/tAw7a
Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20230809205032/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-66457089

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago (16 children)

What country don't deal with violent threats against their politician seriously? Are you suggesting people should act as if threats are protected speech

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes. Until the person takes an action like bringing a rifle to within range of the president and actually attempting to assassinate said president, then it's free speech and you should stop being a fascist.

[–] jackalope@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Making threats isn't a capital offense but it's also jot protected speech. It never has been.

[–] Derproid@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Making threats with intent to carry them out and ability to do so is not protected speech. The tricky part is proving intent to actually carry out the threat like having written plans.

load more comments (13 replies)