Yeah, shame on me for assuming you were commenting on something that mattered to you. Egg on my face for not recognizing that you're just cackling from the sidelines.

It's not about inhability. It's about a system that's in constant peril of sliding into fascism isn't worth defending.

Then you're either saying there's no way to fix that system (which is pointless and petulant). Or that there's work to do beyond voting to make those fixes (which, see my previous comment)

I'm not trying to do that.

Then frankly, it's not clear what you're actually trying to do. Whatever it is, its coming off as pointless and annoying at best and deliberately divisive at worst.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Then you're either saying there's no way to fix that system (which is pointless and petulant).

I beg to differ: POSIWID

The system is beyond saving and is working as intended. Build dual power outside of electoralism. Incidently: that's what I'm planning to do.

[–] null@slrpnk.net -3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Fancy, semantic way of getting right back to my point which was "this system bad > change to different system".

Is that clearer for you?