this post was submitted on 18 May 2024
235 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

58115 readers
3919 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LodeMike 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Don't you mean relative decline?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 29 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

A decline is ALWAYS relative to something, otherwise it wouldn't make sense. So what is it really that you mean?

Intel used to be the undisputed leader both on CPU design and production process. Those positions are both lost, Intel also always used to have huge profits, but has had deficits lately, that used to be absolutely unheard of. They have lost both their economic and technological lead and they have lost marketshare, So how is that not a decline by every measure?

[–] LodeMike 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Actually no. If I am standing still and people move past me, I'm not moving backwards.

[–] RobertoOberto@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago

Your analogy is very incomplete. No one is saying that Intel's products or technology is "moving backwards", but rather that their market share and performance as a company are declining.

Take your person "standing still" and imagine they were previously in the lead during a marathon and suddenly stopped before the finish line. They're not moving backwards, but their position in the race is dropping from first, to second, to third, and they will eventually be last if they don't start moving again.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Don't you mean standing relatively still? /s