this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
312 points (94.1% liked)

Raccoons

2316 readers
1 users here now

A place for raccoons migrating from reddit.

We are allies with the kingdoms of the opossummms, batss, and the birbs.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 85 points 6 months ago (2 children)

For reference, "whole milk" is about 3.5%.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago (2 children)

You’d think whole would be more than half and half.

[–] BubbleMonkey@slrpnk.net 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I believe the reason for this (at least what I’ve been told in a dairy-heavy area) is that nobody calls half and half “milk”. They literally ask for cream, creamer, or half and half when that’s what they are looking for, because it’s not consumed as a stand-alone beverage like milk, and has different properties. And it’s sort of always been this way because the cream floats and they’d skim it off, so the composition of the remaining fluid portion is probably not that different.

So basically it’s not included for the naming scheme because it’s a wholly unrelated product despite having all the same ingredients in different ratios. It’s on the milk spectrum, just like heavy whipping cream, but isn’t what most people would classify as milk.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

because it’s not consumed as a stand-alone beverage like milk,

Nope, I definitely do not have two half gallon cartons of half and half in my fridge right now that will be consumed by the glass.. that would be... weird.. or whatever..

[–] BubbleMonkey@slrpnk.net 7 points 6 months ago

Nothing wrong with that, if your diet allows for the higher fat content and it makes you happy. I’m certainly not going to judge when I have bought heavy whipping cream on multiple occasions for likely the same hedonistic, vaguely taboo, reason.

However, despite having advanced tastes, we are well in the minority. Most people find the mouthfeel alone (by alone I mean without enhancing the flavor) to be… mildly unpleasant. And I sort of get that; we don’t have many super creamy drinks, and the ones we do have are wicked rich/sweet. Whipping cream doesn’t taste like much, in the traditional sense, it’s just more expensive and a higher calorie load, and gives you more phlegm, so most people aren’t going to want it outside of cooking where the lack makes a notable difference. Same with half and half; it’s an ingredient and not a food itself.

If you get something out of the mouthfeel and richer flavor that makes it worth it for you, though, you do you. I totally get it. The richness combined with lactose, instead of sucrose or fructose which are harder on my gut bacteria, is deeply satisfying to me, and always has been.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Maybe, but no one should be drinking a glass of half and half.

[–] Cjwii@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Thank you! This is a question I've pondered my entire life but never actually took the time to look up.

[–] GluWu@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago

Its on the jug, or at least the milk I buy. Which is only 3.25%. I wish it was 5%.