this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
25 points (100.0% liked)

Danger Dust

219 readers
40 users here now

A community for those occupationally exposed to dusts, toxins, pollutants, hazardous materials or noxious environments

Dangerous Dusts , Fibres, Toxins, Pollutants, Occupational Hazards, Stonemasonry, Construction News and Environmental Issues

#Occupational Diseases

#Autoimmune Diseases

#Silicosis

#Cancer

#COPD

#Chronic Fatigue

#Hazardous Materials

#Kidney Disease

#Pneumoconiosis

#The Environment

#Pollutants

#Pesticides

and more

Please be nice to each other and follow the rules : []https://mastodon.world/about

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Bampot@lemmy.world
25
Top engineers urge action against faeces in rivers (www.bbc.co.uk)
submitted 5 months ago by Bampot@lemmy.world to c/dangerdust@lemmy.world
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Human faeces in our rivers is putting the public in danger and the risk will increase without action, the UK's top engineers and scientists have warned in a report.

The report led by the Royal Academy of Engineering called for an upgrade of the UK's sewage system and more widespread testing of the country's waterways.

Despite improvements in the UK's water quality, external over the last thirty years, raw sewage overflowing into rivers and seas remains a persistent problem. Last year on average there were 1,271 spills a day in England - a doubling on the previous year.

Consumption of water contaminated with human faeces exposes people to bacteria such as salmonella and E.coli which cause diarrhoea and vomiting or viruses like hepatitis A which can lead to liver infection.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What do they mean faces in rivers? Like the dead marshes?

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 months ago

I'd risk they mean the actual water ways that traverse the country.

In England they just privatized water and sanitation services, which simply spells disaster: these are expensive systems to maintain and demand constant renewal and upkeep. Privates aim for profits, which are made by cutting costs, not a sustained reinvestment scheme to constantly provide better and better service.