Programmer Humor

32483 readers

508 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
No NSFW content.
Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

cat_programmer@lemmy.ml

1165

its still deprecated (lemmy.world)

submitted 6 months ago by siriusmart@lemmy.world to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

66 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 28 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It's an X Y problem. Please retell the history, starting from your birth, that led to this moment before I contemplate answering your question

Signed, somebody who would rather waste your time than answer the bloody question.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 44 points 6 months ago (2 children)

My for-profit large language model will not be stopped by your "anti commercial ai license" because it hasn't learned to read yet.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 26 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Ive seen people link that one multiple times and i am at a loss what its about.

The cc 4.0 license it points to does not mention AI at all.

CC even has a page where they state that it probably is legal to train on cc protected content but it depends on context.

https://creativecommons.org/2023/08/18/understanding-cc-licenses-and-generative-ai/

I think someone used ai to mean attribution/alike, international. Which are part of the full name (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International) but still make little sense as an acronym next to CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 being the official acronym.

[–] my_hat_stinks@programming.dev 24 points 6 months ago (2 children)

There's no point looking for logic. These people truly believe granting a licence restricts the rights of people who don't agree to the licence, which is the exact opposite of what licenses do. It's blatant misinformation but if you call them out on it (even by quoting their own link) they literally think you're an astroturfer for AI, because that makes more sense to them than the fact they're obviously wrong.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

You don’t understand: these comment footers are the only thing between us and Roko's basilisk.

~ NOT FOR COMMERCIAL USE ~ PRIVATE MODE OF COMMUNICATION ~ NO STEP ON SNEK ~

[–] Liz@midwest.social 1 points 5 months ago

It's one of those situations where corporations get to pull similar bullshit, so they think actual humans get to use the same tricks, too.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

i am at a loss what its about.

The only thing worse than the tech-bro's worshiping AI like it's the next messiah and we all must pave way for this revolutionary technology that will only seem to benefit white Americans with disposable income, are the people on the opposite end of the spectrum who are have a hysterical hatred for LLM's because their favorite Youtube streamers are getting clicks by ranting about how bad AI is. They are not being personally impacted by AI at all but are delusional enough to think that there will be laws and regulations and that AI will be "banned" if we all "raise awareness" and it's about as useful as the Bud Lite protests but not even remotely as entertaining.

[–] rain_worl@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

non-commercial, you can't sell it

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 34 points 6 months ago

Reporter: [REDACTED]
Reason: Spam/misinformation: Not an anti-AI licence.

This person may be confused, but still your tagline is a waste of mods’ time. And just speaking as a user I find it to be annoying visual pollution, especially since I think it’s ineffectual, unless your only goal is to “raise awareness.” Beyond that I think any effectiveness is about as plausible as that of sovereign citizenship.