40
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
40 points (75.6% liked)
VideoEssays
794 readers
1 users here now
About
Videos that give you a new perspective. Here you'll find videos that range all the way from bite-sized snacks to a multi-hour deep dives into the strangest rabbit holes you never even knew you cared about.
Rules
1. Content of posts
All top-level posts should be a link to a video essay that isn't hosted behind a paywall. Any topic is welcome, provided it doesn't break one of the other rules. What's a video essay? See below.
2. Title format
Each post title should include the title of the video, its creator, and its duration in the format [MM:SS] or [HH:MM:SS].
3. Be nice
Be respectful and constructive. No harassment. No grossly offensive images. No hate including expressions of racism, misogyny, transphobia, ableism, xenophobia, homophobia, etc. (although videos where these topics are merely being analyzed are okay).
4. No shitposts
Noticeably low-quality content and videos that stretch any reasonable definition of "video essay" will be removed. If you're not trying to break this rule, you probably aren't.
5. No spam
Don't post the same video multiple times in a short time frame. Don't flood the community with many videos from a single creator at once.
"Video essay"?
"Video essay" is loose genre classification for a type of video that makes an argument or critique, or explains a point of view, usually from a single creator's perspective. They can be short or long, casual or formal, modest or theatrical, and cover any topic.
Video essays are slightly different from documentaries, media reviews, and video journalism, but the lines are blurry, and videos that aren't neatly classifiable are still welcome.
Related Communities
Let me know about any other communities that might fit in this list!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Should a good essay not have an introduction that goes over some of the actual information in the video and establishes the tone/method of delivering that information?
If you’re trying to say that the introduction is not representative of the quality of the rest of the video, you should argue that instead of the rather lame argument that not watching something in it’s entirety prevents any commentary on that thing. It goes hand in hand with someone saying they watched the whole thing and didn’t like it, then asking why they watched the whole thing if they didn’t like it?
There’s a finite amount of time in this life, and every moment spent doing one thing means not doing another. Giving anything stumbled across on the internet 20 minutes of your time to determine if another 3 hours is worthwhile is a decent commitment. When I’ve done that I’ve not made a comment about it because I’d rather let the people who did like the video enjoy it than throw out some negativity, but it’s a completely valid approach to curating one’s time.
It's fine to quit 10% of the way in if you're not into it but it doesn't mean your opinion of what you watched is informed enough to leave a review. That's the point I was making with the silly trailer analogy. Why comment if you didn't watch it?
I watched about an hour and a half of it last night and it's entertainment, yeah, but she's just explaining the manosphere in an entertaining way. Thats how long form video essays work, it's not an academic paper.