this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
47 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

17530 readers
8 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Spzi@lemmy.click 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We should be honest and ensure people join the Fediverse because they share some of the values behind it.

How could that be done? Anyone with the resources can host an instance, and there are plenty of instances with a low entry bar.

If the fediverse grows enough, we can be sure some entities will join not because they share our values, but because they see our value.

I don't see how we could prevent that or ensure only good guys enter. The fediverse is open by design.

[–] Hotchpotch@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The article is not about single persons who might be trolls or whatever to qualify as a "bad guy". But about megacorporations like Meta. The best way to deal with them is-in my opinion-to not cooperate and defederate them as soon as they start to enter.

[–] Spzi@lemmy.click 2 points 1 year ago

The article is not about single persons who might be trolls or whatever to qualify as a “bad guy”. But about megacorporations like Meta.

Yes, sorry for being unclear. I meant the bad 'guy' Meta. Maybe continuing with 'entity' would have been better:

we can be sure some entities will join

ensure only good entities enter


The best way to deal with them is-in my opinion-to not cooperate and defederate them as soon as they start to enter.

I tend to agree. Still quite new to the topic.

[–] Hotchpotch@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

answered to myself accidently.

[–] FrostKing104@mastodon.social 2 points 1 year ago

@Spzi @Hotchpotch I'd say we probably can't ensure it—however it certainly wouldn't won't happen if we push everyone to use it at all costs as they said. Not that I think you're advocating for that.