this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
953 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1436 readers
204 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Source

I see Google's deal with Reddit is going just great...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] golden_zealot@lemmy.ml -4 points 6 months ago (5 children)

If it is considered harmful because people are referencing internet forum comments for treatments for disease then I do not consider myself responsible for the harm.

If people can't understand what anecdotal information is and it kills them, then it's Darwinism.

[–] mawhrin@awful.systems 8 points 6 months ago (4 children)

it's not darwinism, what you're playing with is casual eugenics (you clearly don't value life of certain – arbitrarily chosen – people, and are fine with them suffering harm); don't. there's nothing good waiting for you on that path.

[–] golden_zealot@lemmy.ml -5 points 6 months ago (3 children)
[–] mawhrin@awful.systems 6 points 6 months ago

i don't understand the question – are you asking what makes arbitrary the rule “people who suffered harm because they followed an advice on the internet do not deserve to survive” ?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)