Movies and TV Shows

2139 readers

5 users here now

This is a community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

Keep discussion civil and on topic.
Please do not link to pirated content.
No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Djinn@lemm.ee

100

Judge Denies Alec Baldwin’s Bid to Dismiss Manslaughter Indictment (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 6 months ago by simple@lemm.ee to c/moviesandtv@lemm.ee

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Rivalarrival 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Correct. You have no business discussing this topic.

Being on a film set is not an excuse for reckless behavior. If anything, it makes his actions more egregious, not less.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Being on a film set is not an excuse for reckless behavior. If anything, it makes his actions more egregious, not less.

Stop being so willfully ignorant.

Shits done differently not unssfely

1 person getting shot vs the many who don't proves this is safe

[–] Rivalarrival 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Reducing the safety factor from "everyone is responsible for using multiple safety factors to prevent injury" to "one designated individual is responsible for everything that happens" is not "different". It's dangerous.

You would not tolerate this in any other circumstances. A random gun owner hires a designated safety officer to protect everyone in the area, then recklessly handles a gun and shoots someone. You wouldn't tolerate this exact same behavior from some random redneck; why does Baldwin get a pass?