this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
646 points (96.0% liked)

Memes @ Reddthat

1005 readers
1 users here now

The Memes community. Where Memes matter the most.

We abide by Reddthat's Instance Rules & the Lemmy Code of Conduct. By interacting here you agree to these terms.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 46 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Alimony is off the table when infidelity can be proved in court. This was the case even when alimony was super common back in the 80s and 90s.

If you were a homemaker seeking divorce you could get alimony without being a perfect person, but infidelity was one of the few instant "no"s in divorce court.

[–] gramie@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That is entirely untrue for divorce in Ontario, and probably other parts of Canada. Spousal support and divorce settlements in general have nothing to do with infidelity. No-fault divorce is available after 1 year of separation. For the financials the court uses a formula based on length of marriage and relative incomes as their guideline.

[–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Good for Ontario for learning from the clusterfuck down South.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

Bad for Ontario for creating a strict formula with no caps that doesn't consider the possibility that the man might not be making as money later in his career. Dave Foley got a divorce when he was at the top of his career, but since he's not on TV anymore and not making anywhere near the money he was getting when he was on TV. His alimony payments are higher than his income now, the judge admitted this, but the law didn't consider this as a possibility. Last I heard he can't return to Canada or he'll be arrested.

So it's a poorly written law.