Programmer Humor

32003 readers

1094 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
No NSFW content.
Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

cat_programmer@lemmy.ml

855

Lemmy today (i.imgflip.com)

submitted 3 months ago by HowManyNimons@lemmy.world to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

198 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They provide a whole lot more to begin with.

[–] sudneo@lemm.ee -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sure, which is why I said:

(Sure, WAF etc. but you get the point).

An online casino would mostly benefit from WAF, DDoS protection and caching.

The arguments I was responding to is like saying that if you get too many web attacks they should kick you because the WAF is not anymore profitable. It doesn't make any sense.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They didn't get kicked out. Just moved to a more expensive solution / pricing structure

[–] sudneo@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

Cloudflare wasn’t going to eat that loss anymore so they kicked them to the curb to save money.

I am arguing with the logic that claims this is reasonable, not discussing what they did.

I don't have a problem saying that they should charge more, but it's them who made an unlimited plan to become a monopoly charging 250/month.