Technology

59440 readers

3623 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

468

Google's "Manifest V2" Chrome extension phaseout next month is expected to impact the original uBlock Origin extension, which still uses the V2 framework and has 37 million users (www.theregister.com)

submitted 5 months ago by ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

98 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The new MV3 architecture reflects Google's avowed desire to make browser extensions more performant, private, and secure. But the internet giant's attempt to do so has been bitterly contested by makers of privacy-protecting and content-blocking extensions, who have argued that the Chocolate Factory's new software architecture will lead to less effective privacy and content-filtering extensions.

For users of uBlock Origin, which runs on Manifest V2, "options" means using the less capable uBlock Origin Lite, which supports Manifest V3.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Those are all chromium based. They all are connected to google and will all have the manifest v3 change.
That is unless they will support v3 but keep some doors open for content blockers ( this is mozillas plan )

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes all chromium based browsers are chromium based. What do you mean by they are connected to Google? Yes Google provides the chromium code, but my Vivaldi browser isn't connecting to Google servers or sending them anything

[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

What i meant is that chromium is owned and managed by google. If chromium ( and therefor all chromium based browsers ) gets a change, they all do by default. Things like vivaldi or brave will get this change unless they specifically implement ways around it, which i dont think they will.
Though its way less than chrome, chromium still has links with google and has been found to ping google once in a while even though youre not using google.

To be accurate, chrome in itself is a chromium based browser. Its chromium with google stuff slapped onto it.

Its because of this that i find the "but im using [chromium based browser here], so i wont be affected by change x" a false one, because they will.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

"change unless they specifically implement ways around it, which i dont think they will."

I'm sorry my friend, but I get the impression you are speaking from a perspective of ignorance.

https://vivaldi.com/blog/manifest-v3-webrequest-and-ad-blockers/

[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

I am corrected, thanks :) Im legit surprised they did anything towards the issue, so thanks for pointing it out.
That said, ad blocking is only a part of the problem and there are a lot of extensions that work on content loading in browsers that are going to be invalidated with the chromium update that an integrated ad blocking feature ( that i hope you can customise to your hearts content ) will not fix..

[–] corus_kt@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

This is great news, Vivaldi is my fav 'side' browser