Asklemmy

43380 readers

1480 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Best way to backup files (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 3 months ago by emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I have about 500GB of data (photos, documents, videos etc.) that I have accumulated over the years. Currently, I keep them on my computer and rsync all additions / changes once a month or so to an external hard drive. Do I need to be worried about data loss (sectors going bad, bit rot, bit flip, whatever it is called)?

To clarify,

None of this is commercially important; I just don't want to get into a situation where I look up an old family photo or video twenty years down the line and it has got corrupted.
Both my computer and the external HD are HDDs. They are fairly cheap here (and very cheap if second hand). Buying SSDs or dedicated hardware would be expensive.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] criitz@reddthat.com 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Instead of a single external HD set up a NAS with a raid configuration so that even if a drive fails the data is safe.

[–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I want to point out that RAID doesn't actively prevent bit rot and data degradation. You'll want ZFS/RAIDZ for that.

[–] criitz@reddthat.com 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not super familiar with ZFS/RAIDZ, I guess it does extra data scrubbing and stuff to prevent data issues?

That's cool. But a traditonal RAID setup still gives you redundancy and fault tolerance which is the important part, right?

[–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's a software RAID integrated in the filesystem, as I understand it. This video helped me understand it a bit more and it's why I'm saying ZFS is a better idea. afaik you get the good parts of raid and some more. Obviously I have very superficial knowledge on all of this though, so I recommend doing your own reading :P

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 3 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

This video

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.