this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
1189 points (97.6% liked)

Atheist Memes

5586 readers
36 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!religiouscringe@midwest.social

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What do you think whataboutism means?

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'd probably DuckDuckGo it. I based that comment on the use of the words "what" and "about".

/me visits DDG...

Eh, maybe it's the wrong word. This sort of reminds me of a discussion I saw on YT a few months ago between a Christian taking the eye argument, and Prof Dawkins giving his best response: lots of mights, maybes, could'ves, topped off with billions of years, which doesn't appear to satisfy the former who then follows up with "what about..." I can't remember what, but I do remember the gist of Dawkins' response which was something along the lines of: you led with your best; I answered that; I'm not going round in circles at this point. So I'm with Dawkins now (and in fact as a Christian I actually agree with a lot of what he says. We do need to think things through and not take them on blind faith.)

So in other words I've given a sound explanation for the dashing babies on a rock question and I'm going to leave it there.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Right but God does so much cruel stuff in the old testament that it's weird to miss and dispute that overall point.

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee -2 points 5 months ago

Sure. But there's a process.

  1. Patience.
  2. Send prophets to try to correct behaviour.
  3. More patience.
  4. More prophets.
  5. Patience and prophets, over and over.
  6. OK fine, you won't have it any other way. Judgment.

We see prophets actually work. Jonah didn't want to go to Nineveh, he wanted to jump straight to 6, but God had other plans. When God finally got him to go to Nineveh, the people listened, repented, and judgment was avoided. The reason Jonah didn't want to go is that he thought there was a strong possibility of that outcome and he wanted the Ninevites to suffer judgment.

Hmm.. just noticed the sidebar. This defence of the OT probably violates Rule 1. Forget the above, yay God, what a dick, punishing people for being evil!