this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
26 points (86.1% liked)
Privacy
4163 readers
22 users here now
A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy
Rules:
- Be civil
- No spam posting
- Keep posts on-topic
- No trolling
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Absolutely false, you can store data encrypted on the blockchain, such that it can be read only by a recipient. In this way it functions no differently than sending an encrypted email. But Bitmessage isn't even a cryptocurrency, it just uses the ideas from them
Why would you want to store messages, even encrypted ones, on a publicly accessible distributed database with no delete function?
Bitmessage was created well before the concept of post quantum encryption was widely discussed, so it is not safe for that use case.
... because it's publicly accessible with no delete function
Correct, and that is bad. Very bad. The fact that in BitMessage, "every message gets sent to everyone" is something nobody wants or asked for.
Seems self-evident to me why the protocol has been languishing and mostly ignored for the past decade or so.