this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
55 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

48216 readers
1320 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Currently, my desktop computer has two storage devices attached: one 1TB NVME SSD, which has both Windows 10 and Linux Mint 21.2 installed on it (Each OS getting ~ 500 GB), and a 1TB SATA hard drive mostly used for Timeshift backups of the Linux Mint partition (Including my Home folder, for the record).

Later today I'm expecting to receive two more 1TB SSDs. When I've finished the upgrade process, I'd like to have my Linux Mint installation transferred to a RAID 1 array comprised of the two new drives and expand the Windows 10 partition to take up the whole existing SSD.

My current plan for doing this is to use my existing installation USB drive to install a fresh Linux Mint 21.1 installation on the two new drives, then use Timeshift to 'restore' my most recent backup from the existing installation. Is there a better way of going about this that I'm not already aware of?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] anonono@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

why not? sudo cp -ax foots the bill.

I assume people prefer rsync because you may need to run it twice, but unless you tick all the boxes rsync won't copy capabilities (see getcap /usr/bin/rsh)

sudo cp -ax is short and sweet and does everything right.

[–] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Why not DD? Dd is agnostic to anything, just copy over the entire partition and you're golden

[–] t0m5k1@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Man I always forget about dd and jump to gparted.

[–] anonono@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

dd is good if the destination disk is equal or bigger, unless you are brave enough to shrink the source partition.

if you are moving to a smaller disk for whatever reason (hdd to sdd) then you need to fallback to a different method, which takes us back to cp/rsync.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because cat and cp are faster if you don't pick a good block size for dd.

[–] yum13241@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How are you supposed to use cat to copy files? catting binary files does, interesting things.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You cat the device files of the partitions directly into each other.

[–] yum13241@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

cat /dev/sda/ > /dev/sdb?

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm always hesitant to use the "disk destroyer", even as a regular user. rsync does a good job and it's maybe even more agnostic than dd since it doesn't really care about the partition size, as long as all data fits.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

rsync is also more reliable: in cases the transfer is interrupted it only transfers what's missing and it can run the checksums making sure there were no transfer errors. I don't see a good reason to use cp.